THE INEXPLICABLE SOLAR SYSTEM.
Solar System Bodies move in a manner that is INEXPLICABLE in terms of any known laws of physics!
One of the (many!) INEXPLICABLE features of the movements of Solar System Bodies is “OCTANT HUGGING”.
The Laws of Newtonian Physics cannot explain why “OCTANT HUGGING” occurs, and yet “OCTANT HUGGING” is a general and consistent feature of The Solar System.
“OCTANT HUGGING” can be easily seen as soon as you look at ANGLES revolved or rotated during specified time periods.
This website (www.octantsrule.com) contains over 80 images displaying over 300 “OCTANT HUGGING” ANGLES (and more “in the pipeline”). With this profusion of examples, chance occurrence cannot possibly be the explanation.
I am currently offering a cash prize of £32,000 (sterling) to any academic astronomer who can explain why “OCTANT HUGGING” occurs, using only the accepted principles of Newtonian Physics, or who can show that “OCTANT HUGGING” is actually NOT a general and consistent feature of The Solar System. For terms and conditions, click on this link:-
For a list of academic astronomers who have been contacted, and have so far failed to collect this prize money, click on this link:-
Also, for further similar cash prizes relating to other INEXPLICABLE Solar System features (of planet and satellite movements), click on this link:-
“OCTANT HUGGING” is very easy to understand. It requires no technical or mathematical knowledge – only a basic ability of VISUAL PATTERN RECOGNITION. You can see at a glance when “OCTANT HUGGING” is taking place.
QUESTION:- What is “OCTANT HUGGING”?
ANSWER:- To clarify this, it is easier to provide a visual demonstration.
The image below depicts (as radiuses of the circle) The EIGHT OCTANTS (“Octo” is Latin for Eight.), ie:- 0˚(360˚) 45˚ 90˚ 135˚ 180˚ 225˚ 270˚ 315˚
www.octantsrule.com
It turns out that ANGLES revolved or rotated during specified time periods (in The Solar System) tend to “HUG” THE OCTANTS, ie:- to be very close to THE OCTANTS. This is a general and consistent feature throughout The Solar System; and Newtonian Physics cannot explain why it happens!
I will pay £500 to anyone who can show that any single one of the angles on this web site are incorrectly drawn or incorrectly calculated!
EXAMPLE ONE. The following image depicts the ANGLES revolved by Planet Earth during the orbital period of each of the other eight planets. Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
You would have to be blind to not notice that all the ANGLES are very close to THE OCTANTS.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
The next image depicts (an impression of) how these angles (in EXAMPLE 1. above) OUGHT to look if Newtonian Physics ALONE governed the movements of Solar System Bodies. (These ANGLES SHOULD be randomly distributed, without any obvious pattern!)
EXAMPLE 2. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by The Moon and The Planets during One Earth Year.
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
No astronomer would even suggest that the above (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING” could be explained by Newtonian Physics. There is no way that Earth’s revolution can (by gravitation or “tidal friction”) “control” the rotation of very distant planets such as Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. Professor Zdenek Kopal (in his book The Realm of The Terrestrial Planets, page 191) tells us “A tidal coupling between Venus and Earth is almost negligible.” Now Venus is our closest planet. How much more “negligible” is the tidal influence of Planet Earth as exerted upon Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto?
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
Incidentally, The Octants Rule in The Solar System, which is a "Rule of Eighths", also applies to The Atom (The Octet Rule). For details, click on this link:-
www.solarsystemtimeperiods.com/octet-rule
The Octants Rule in The Solar System also applies to The Diatonic Scale in music, whose ratios are (all but one) perfect multiples of ONE EIGHTH. For details, click on this link:-
www.solarsystemtimeperiods.com/music-ratios
EXAMPLE 3. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by The Sun and Inner Solar System Planets during One Moon Orbital Period. (Note:- Mercury “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.)
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 4. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during One Lunar Node Revolution Period by Earth and its two neighbour planets (Venus and Mars).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 5. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by The Moon during the orbital periods of Earth and The Superior Naked-Eye-Visible Planets (ie:- Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 6. This image depicts ANGLES revolved by Venus during various Moon periods. (A). During The Moon’s orbital period. (B). During The Lunar Node revolution period, and (C). During The Lunar Perigeal revolution period.
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 7. This image depicts ANGLES revolved during one Lunar Perigeal Revolution Period by The Two Inferior Planets (Mercury and Venus).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 8. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by The Lunar Perigee during the orbital periods of The Two Ice Giants (Uranus and Neptune).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 9. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by The Lunar Node during the orbital periods of The Three “Telescopic” Planets (Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 10. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during One Lunar Day by (neighbour planets) Mars and Jupiter and their INNERMOST Satellites (ie:- Mars’ Phobos, and Jupiter’s Metis).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 11. Uranus has Four LARGE Satellites (Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon – excluding the merely medium-sized satellite Miranda). This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Uranus during the orbital periods of each of its four LARGE Satellites.
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 12. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during Pluto’s rotation period by the three planets closest to Pluto (Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 13. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during Uranus’ rotation period by The Two Giant Planets that are inferior to Uranus (Jupiter and Saturn).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 14. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during Uranus’ orbital period by Uranus’ two neighbour planets (Saturn and Neptune).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 15. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Saturn during the rotation periods of the three planets that are superior to Saturn (Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 16. This image depicts ANGLES rotated during Mercury’s rotation period by Mercury’s two neighbours (The Sun and Venus).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 17. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during Mercury’s orbital period by the other three Inner Solar System Planets (Venus, Earth, and Mars).
Each ANGLE is displayed as SINGLE LINE RADIUS of the circle.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 18. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by Neptune during the orbital periods of Neptune’s two neighbour planets (Uranus and Pluto).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 19. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during Neptune’s rotation period by The Two Other PROGRADE (rotation) Giant Planets (Jupiter and Saturn).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 20. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Jupiter during the rotation periods of The Two Ice Giants (Uranus and Neptune).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 21. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during One Earth Rotation Period by Uranus and its Four LARGE Satellites (Ariel, Umbriel, Titania and Oberon – Note::- Oberon “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 22. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during One Earth Rotation Period by The Four Giant Planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune – Note:- Jupiter “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 23. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during various Lunar periods. (A). The Anomalistic Month (27.5545505 Earth days), and (B). The Moon’s Orbital Period (27.321661 Earth days), and (C). The Lunar Evection Period (31.807 Earth days), and (D). The Period of The Inequality of The Moon’s Motion in Longitude (27.4304 Earth days), and (E). The Moon’s Synodic Period (29.5305882 Earth days), and (F). The Moon’s Nodical Month (27.212220 Earth days – which “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 24. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Mars during various Lunar periods. (A). The Anomalistic Month (27.5545505 Earth days), and (B). The Moon’s Nodical Month (27.212220 Earth days), and (C). The Moon’s Orbital Period (27.321661 Earth days), and (D). The Lunar Evection Period (31.807 Earth days), and (E). The Period of The Inequality of The Moon’s Motion in Longitude (27.4304 Earth days), and (F). The Moon’s Synodic Period (29.5305882 Earth days) – which “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 25. The Lunar Node passes The Lunar Perigee every 3566.882276 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during this time period by Large Inner Solar System Bodies, ie:- The Sun, Venus, Earth, and Mars (Note:- Mercury and the Moon both “fail” The Octants Rule, and are therefore both excluded from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 26. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Mars during the orbital periods of the (other) Large PROGRADE (rotation) Inner Solar System Revolving Bodies (Mercury, Earth, and the Moon).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 27. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during One Earth Year by The OUTERMOST LARGE Satellites of The Naked-Eye-Visible Planets (ie:- The Moon, and Jupiter satellite Callisto, and Saturn satellite Iapetus, and Uranus satellite Oberon – Note:- Uranus is just visible with the naked eye, when the viewing is very good, but is not normally classed as a naked-eye-visible planet.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 28. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during the orbital periods of The OUTERMOST LARGE Satellites of planets out as far as Neptune. (ie:- The Moon, and Jupiter satellite Callisto, and Saturn satellite Iapetus, and Uranus satellite Oberon, and Neptune satellite Triton. (Note that Iapetus “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 29. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during one Earth Rotation Period by The INNERMOST Satellites of the Superior Fast Rotating Planets, (ie:- Mars satellite Phobos, and Jupiter satellite Metis, and Saturn satellite Pan, and Uranus satellite Cordelia, and Neptune satellite Naiad).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 30. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during the orbital periods of The PRIMARY SATELLITES of The Four Giant Planets, (ie:- Jupiter’ satellite Ganymede, and Saturn satellite Titan, and Uranus satellite Titania, and Neptune satellite Triton.) (Note:- Ganymede “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.) (Note:- A PRIMARY SATELLITE is the LARGEST Satellite for a particular planet.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 31. Mars’ LARGEST Satellite is Phobos. The SUM of the orbital and rotation periods of Phobos = 0.63782046 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during this time period by The (other) Three FAST ROTATING Inner Solar System Bodies (Earth, Mars, and Mars satellite Deimos).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 32. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during the orbital periods of The SUB-PRIMARY Satellites of the planets out as far as Neptune. (Earth has no SUB-Primary Satellite – Mars’ SUB-Primary satellite is Deimos, and Jupiter’s SUB-Primary satellite is Callisto, and Saturn’s SUB-Primary satellite is Rhea, and Uranus’ SUB-Primary satellite is Oberon, and Neptune’s SUB-Primary satellite is Proteus. Rhea “fails” Elliott’s “Octant Hugging” Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image. A SUB-Primary Satellite is The SECOND LARGEST Satellite for a particular planet.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 33. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during One Earth Year by The SUB-PRIMARY Satellites of The Four Giant Planets. (Jupiter’s SUB-Primary satellite is Callisto, and Saturn’s SUB-Primary satellite is Rhea, and Uranus’ SUB-Primary satellite is Oberon, and Neptune’s SUB-Primary satellite is Proteus. Proteus “fails” Elliott’s “Octant Hugging” Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image. A SUB-Primary Satellite is The SECOND LARGEST Satellite for a particular planet.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 34. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by The Two Ice Giants (Uranus and Neptune) during the orbital periods of their respective PRIMARY Satellites. (Uranus’ PRIMARY Satellite is Titania, and Neptune’s PRIMARY Satellite is Triton. A PRIMARY Satellite is the LARGEST Satellite for a particular planet.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 35. Jupiter has Four LARGE Satellites. In ascending orbit order, they are:- Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by the other three LARGE Jupiter Satellites during the orbital period of their INNERMOST Member, Io.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 36. The INNERMOST Satellites for each of The Four Giant Planets are as follows:- Jupiter satellite Metis, and Saturn satellite Pan, and Uranus satellite Cordelia, and Neptune satellite Naiad. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during METIS’ orbital period by the other three above-mentioned (Innermost) Satellites.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 37. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by Jupiter’s Four Small “Inner” Satellites (Metis, Adrastea, Amalthea, and Thebe) during One Earth Day.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 38. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during TWO Earth Years by Jupiter and its Four Small “Inner” Satellites (Metis, Adrastea, Amalthea, and Thebe). (Note:- Metis “fails” Elliott’s “Octant Hugging” Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 39. Triton is Neptune’s PRIMARY (ie:- LARGEST) Satellite. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during One Triton Orbital Period by Triton’s Two “Size Neighbours” (Neptune and Proteus).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 40. Styx is the INNERMOST Satellite of (binary planet) Pluto/Charon. (Then, moving outwards, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra.) The SUM of Styx’s orbital and rotation periods = 40.3231 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during this time period by Pluto system bodies out as far as Kerberos.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 41. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved during the rotation period of (binary planet) Pluto/Charon by The Three INNERMOST Satellites of The Pluto System (Styx, Nix, and Kerberos).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 42. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by The Pluto Satellites (Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra) during TWO Earth Years. (Note:- Styx and Kerberos both “fail” The Octants Rule, and are therefore omitted from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 43. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during (A). TWO Earth DAYS, and (B). TWO Earth YEARS.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 44. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Mars and its satellite Deimos during the orbital and rotation periods of Venus. (A). ANGLE rotated by Mars during Venus’ rotation period, and (B). ANGLE rotated by Deimos during Venus’ rotation period, and (C). ANGLE rotated by Mars during Venus’ orbital period, and
(D). ANGLE rotated by Deimos during Venus’ orbital period.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 45. One of The Four Short Term Sunspot Cycles as discovered by Balfour Stewart is 32.955 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during TWICE this time period by each of The Planets. (Note:- Earth, Saturn, and Neptune all “fail” The Octants Rule, and are therefore excluded from the image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 46. Solar physicist Balfour Stewart identified Four Short Term Sunspot Cycles. (A). The Sun’s rotation period = 24.66225 Earth days. The Four Short Term Sunspot Cycles are:- (B). 24.011 Earth days. (C). 32.955 Earth days. (D). 26.871 Earth days. (E). 24.142 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Jupiter (The LARGEST Planet in The Solar System) during TWICE each of the above time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 47. Solar physicist Balfour Stewart identified Four Short Term Sunspot Cycles:- (A). 24.011 Earth days. (B). 32.955 Earth days. (C). 26.871 Earth days. (D). 24.142 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by The Moon during each of these time periods. (Note:- (B). “fails” The Octants Rule, and (D). pretty much duplicates (A). In that case, both of these are excluded from the image.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 48. The Four Giant Planets are:- Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The INNERMOST satellites for each planet are:- Jupiter satellite Metis, and Saturn satellite Pan, and Uranus satellite Cordelia, and Neptune satellite Naiad. The DIFFERENCES between the rotation period of the parent planet and the INNERMOST Satellite are as follows:- (A). Jupiter/Metis:- 0.11876 Earth days, and (B). Saturn/Pan 0.13104 Earth days, and (C). Uranus/Cordelia 0.3833 Earth days, and (D). Neptune/Naiad 0.376856 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these four time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 49. The Naked-Eye-Visible Planets (arranged in ascending orbit order) are:- Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. The INNERMOST Satellites of The Naked-Eye-Visible Planets are:- (Mercury and Venus have no satellites.) Earth satellite The Moon, and Mars satellite Phobos, and Jupiter satellite Metis, and Saturn satellite Pan. The Lunar Day = 1.0350501 Earth days. The Phobosic Day = 0.462753 Earth days. The Metisic Day = 1.026478 Earth days. The Panic Day = 1.948473 Earth days.
(A). Lunar day + Phobosic Day = 1.4978 Earth days. (B). Phobosic Day + Metisic Day = 1.48923 Earth days. (C). Metisic day + Panic Day = 2.97495 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these three time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
MIMAS. The next several images all involve Saturn’s INNERMOST LARGE Satellite MIMAS. For whatever reason, MIMAS seems to have its movements very precisely synchronized (in respect of The Octants Rule) with a profusion of Solar System time periods. Why this synchronization should specifically involve MIMAS, rather than some other Solar System body is not clear.
EXAMPLE 50. (MIMAS). This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by MIMAS during various Lunar periods. (A). The Anomalistic Month (27.5545505 Earth days), and (B). The Moon’s Orbital Period (27.321661 Earth days), and (C). The Lunar Evection Period (31.807 Earth days), and (D). The Period of The Inequality of The Moon’s Motion in Longitude (27.4304 Earth days), and (E). The Moon’s Synodic Period (29.5305882 Earth days) – which “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image), and (F). The Moon’s Nodical Month (27.212220 Earth days).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 51. MIMAS. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by The Three LARGEST Asteroids (1. Ceres, 2. Pallas, and 4. Vesta) during One MIMAS Orbital Period.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 52. MIMAS. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by MIMAS during the orbital periods of the satellites of (binary planet) Pluto/Charon (Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra). (Note:- Hydra “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from the image.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 53. MIMAS. This image depicts the ANGLES revolved by MIMAS during the rotation periods of The Three SLOW Rotating Inner Solar System Revolving Bodies (Mercury, Venus, and The Moon).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 54. MIMAS. Mimas is The INNERMOST LARGE Satellite of Saturn. Jupiter is the neighbour planet of Saturn. Metis is Jupiter’s INNERMOST Satellite. Io is Jupiter’s INNERMOST LARGE Satellite. This image depicts the following ANGLES:- (A). ANGLE revolved by MIMAS during TWO Jupiter rotation periods; and
(B). ANGLE revolved by MIMAS during TWO Metis rotation periods; and
(C). ANGLE revolved by MIMAS during TWO Io rotation periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 55. MIMAS. Uranus’ INNERMOST Satellite is Cordelia. Uranus’ INNERMOST LARGE Satellite is Ariel. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Uranus, Cordelia, and Ariel during TWO MIMAS orbital periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 56. MIMAS. The LARGE Satellites of Saturn, arranged in ascending orbit order are:- MIMAS, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, Rhea, Titan, Hyperion, and Iapetus. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated during TWO MIMAS orbital periods by Saturn, Enceladus, and Tethys.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 57. MIMAS. Mimas is Saturn’s INNERMOST LARGE Satellite. The Two Saturn Neighbour Planets are:- Jupiter, and Uranus. This image depicts the following ANGLES:- (A). ANGLE rotated by MIMAS during TWO Jupiter rotation periods, sand (B). ANGLE rotated by Saturn during TWO MIMAS rotation periods, and (C). ANGLE rotated by Uranus during TWO MIMAS rotation periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 58. MIMAS AND INNERMOST SATELLITES.
MIMAS is Saturn’s INNERMOST LARGE Satellite. Io is Jupiter’s INNERMOST LARGE Satellite. Metis is Jupiter’s INNERMOST (small) Satellite. Cordelia is Uranus’ INNERMOST (small) Satellite. Naiad is Neptune’s INNERMOST (small) Satellite. Miranda is Uranus’ INNERMOST LARGE Satellite. This image depicts The ANGLES (A). Revolved by MIMAS during TWO Io orbital periods. (B). Revolved by MIMAS during TWO Metis orbital periods. (C). Revolved by Cordelia during TWO MIMAS orbital periods. (D). Revolved by MIMAS during TWO Naiad orbital periods. (E). Revolved by MIMAS during TWO Miranda orbital periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 59.
(A). The SUM of the orbital periods of The INNERMOST Satellites of The Two Gas Giants (Jupiter and Saturn) = 0.86983 Earth days. (B). The SUM of the orbital periods of The INNERMOST Satellites of The Two Ice Giants (Uranus and Neptune) = 0.629429 Earth days. This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these two time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 60.
(A). The SUM of the orbital periods of The INNERMOST Satellites of The Prograde (rotation) Planets = 28.8048 Earth days. (B). The SUM of the orbital periods of The INNERMOST Satellites of The Retrograde (rotation) Planets = 6.72226 Earth days. This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these two time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 61.
(A). The SUM of the orbital periods of The LARGE Satellites of The Naked-Eye-Visible Planets = 184.49262 Earth days.
(B). The SUM of the orbital periods of The LARGE Satellites of The Telescopic Planets = 42.511224 Earth days.
This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these two time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 62.
(A). The SUM of the rotation periods of The Four Inner Solar System SLOW Rotating Bodies = 353.6488 Earth days.
(B). The SUM of the rotation periods of The Four Inner Solar System FAST Rotating Bodies = 3.6046 Earth days.
This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these two time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 63. The Seven Inner Solar System Revolving Bodies are:- Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, The Moon, and (Mars satellites) Phobos and Deimos.
(A).The SUM of their orbital periods = 1393.80744 Earth days.
(B).The SUM of their rotation periods = 332.591139 Earth days.
(C).The SUM of their synodic revolution periods = 1876.1069 Earth days.
(D).The SUM of their synodic rotation periods = 248.9331 Earth days.
This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these four time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 64. The Two Inferior Planets are Mercury and Venus.
(A). The SUM of their SIDEREAL Rotation Periods = 301.6649 Earth days.
(B). The SUM of their SYNODIC Rotation Periods = 215.7912 Earth days.
This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 65. The Four Giant Planets are:- Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
(A). The SUM of their rotation periods = 2.24713 Earth days.
(B). The SUM of the rotation periods of (each of) their INNERMOST Satellites = 1.49026 Earth days.
(C). The SUM of the rotation periods of (each of) their INNERMOST LARGE Satellites = 11.10878 Earth days.
This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by Planet Earth during these three time periods.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 66. The SUM of the orbital and rotation periods of Venus = 467.71937 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by (neighbour planets) Earth and Mars and their satellites (ie:- The Moon, and Mars satellites Phobos and Deimos) during this time period.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 67. Jupiter has Four LARGE Satellites (The “Galilean” Satellites). The SUM of their orbital and rotation periods = 58.32778 Earth days. This image depicts the ANGLES rotated by The Six LARGE Inner Solar System Bodies (ie:- The Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth, The Moon, and Mars) during this time period.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 68. Mars’ rotation period = 1.025957 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). Rotated by The Seven Inner Solar System Revolving Bodies, and (B). Rotated by The Four Giant Planets, and (C). Rotated by The Five Large Discordant Non-Planetary Bodies, and (D). Rotated by Jupiter’s Four Small “Inner” Satellites, and (E). Rotated by Uranus and its Five Large Satellites, and (F). Rotated by The Three “Telescopic” Planets (Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto), and (G). Rotated by Saturn and its LARGE Satellites, and (H). Revolved by The INNERMOST Satellites of The Inner Solar System (The Moon and Phobos), and (I). Rotated by The INNERMOST Satellites of The Solar System, and (J). During TWO Mars rotation periods, revolved by The Five Pluto Satellites, and (K). During TWO Mars Rotation Periods, Revolved by The INNERMOST Satellites of (each of) The Four Giant Planets.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 69. The Sun’s rotation period = 24.66225 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). Revolved by The Nine Planets, and (B). Rotated by The Nine Planets, and (C). Revolved by The Nineteen LARGE Satellites.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 70. This image depicts The SUM of The ANGLES During ONE EARTH DAY (A). Rotated by The Four Inner Solar System Planets, and (B). Rotated by The Four Inner Solar System NON-Planetary Bodies, and (C). Rotated by The Five Outer Solar System Planets, and (D). Revolved by The LARGE Satellites of The Two “Ice Giants” (Uranus and Neptune), and (E). Rotated by The Two “Gas Giants” and their LARGE Satellites.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 71. One of The Short Term Sunspot Cycles discovered by Balfour Stewart is 32,955 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). Rotated by Earth and Moon, and (B). Rotated by Jupiter and its Four Small “Inner” Satellites, and (C). Revolved by Jupiter and its Four LARGE (“Galilean”) Satellites, and (D). Revolved by Uranus and its Four LARGE Satellites, and (E). Rotated by The Four Giant Planets, and (F). Rotated by Saturn and its LARGE Satellites, and (G). Revolved by Mars and its Two Satellites, and (H). Revolved by The Five LARGE Inner Solar System Revolving Bodies, and (I). Revolved by Pluto and its Five Satellites, and (J). Revolved by Neptune and its Single LARGE Satellite, and (K). Revolved by The Moon and The Planets, and (L). Rotated by The Eight Planets, and (M). Rotated by The Sun and The Planets.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 72. The SUM of The Sun’s Sidereal and Synodic Rotation Periods = 51.11028 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). Revolved by The Two Mars satellites, and (B). revolved by Jupiter’s Four Small “Inner” Satellites, and (C). Revolved by Jupiter’s Four LARGE (“Galilean”) Satellites, and (D). Revolved by The Three Inner Solar System Satellites, and (E). Rotated by The Four Giant Planets, and (F). Rotated by Earth and Moon, and (G). Revolved by The LARGE Satellites of The Two “Ice Giants” (Uranus and Neptune).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 73. TWICE The SUM of The Sun’s Sidereal and Synodic Rotation Periods = 102.22056 Earth days. This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by The Large PROGRADE (rotation) Revolving Bodies of The Inner Solar System (ie:- Mercury, Earth, The Moon, and Mars, but excluding Venus, which has Retrograde Rotation).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 74. Mercury’s Rotation Period = 58.6462 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). Rotated by Mars and its Two Satellites, and (B). Revolved by The Three Inner Solar System Satellites, and (C). Revolved by Jupiter and its Four LARGE (“Galilean”) Satellites, and (D). Revolved by Jupiter’s Four Small “Inner” Satellites, and (E). Rotated by The Four Inner Solar System NON-Planetary Bodies, and (F). Rotated by Mercury’s Two Neighbours (The Sun and Venus).
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 75. This image depicts The ANGLES rotated by The Naked-Eye-Visible Superior Planets (ie:- Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) during One Sun Oscillation Period.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 76. The Sun’s Oscillation Period = 0.11111111 Earth days. This image depicts The ANGLES revolved by The INNERMOST Satellites of The Four Giant Planets (ie:- Jupiter’s Metis, and Saturn’s Pan, and Uranus’ Cordelia, and Neptune’s Naiad during TWO Sun Oscillation Periods. (Note:- Cordelia “fails” The Octants Rule, and is therefore excluded from this image.)
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 77. Mars’ orbital period = 686.9782 Earth days. This image depicts The ANGLES revolved during TWO Mars Orbital Periods by the three other Inner Solar System Planets (ie:- Mercury, Venus, and Earth.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 78. There are Three Inner Solar System Satellites, The Moon, and Mars satellites Phobos and Deimos. In this example, we see how The Planet Mars has its movements synchronized with these three satellites in respect of The Octants Rule.
(A). During TWO Phobos rotation periods, Mars rotates 223.8 degrees.
(B). During TWO Mars rotation periods, Deimos rotates 1 complete rotation + 225.1 degrees).
(C). During ONE Moon rotation period, Mars rotates 26 complete rotations + 226.9 degrees.
This image depicts these three angles.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 79. The Sun’s rotation period = 24.66225 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). Rotated by The Sun and its Four LARGE Satellites (planets), and (B). Rotated by Earth and its single LARGE Satellite, and (C). Rotated by Saturn and its Eight LARGE Satellites, and (D). Rotated by Uranus and its Four LARGE Satellites, and (E). Revolved by Pluto and its single LARGE Satellite.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 80. The Sun’s rotation period = 24.66225 Earth days. This image depicts, during this time period, The SUM of The ANGLES (A). REVOLVED by The Planets, and (B). ROTATED by The Planets, and (C). Revolved by The LARGE Satellites of the Solar System.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 81. This example involves various Octant Rule relationships between Venus and the Earth/Moon System. This involves TEN ANGLES which display very very "tight" Octant Hugging. To see this example, click on this link:-
EXAMPLE 82. PLUTO AND THE MOON.
This image displays the following ANGLES:-
(A). The ANGLE rotated by (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during One Lunar Node Revolution Period,
(B). The ANGLE rotated by (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during One Lunar Perigeal Revolution Period.
(C). The ANGLE rotated by (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during One Lunar Synodic Revolution Period.
(D). The ANGLE rotated by (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during One (Lunar) Anomalistic Month.
(E). The ANGLE rotated by (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during One (Lunar) Nodical Month.
(F). The ANGLE revolved by The Lunar Node during One Pluto Orbital Period.
(G). The ANGLE revolved by The Moon during One Pluto Orbital Period.
(H). The ANGLE revolved by The Lunar Node in relation to The Lunar Perigee during One Pluto Orbital Period.
(I). The SUM of The ANGLES rotated by Pluto and its Five Satellites during One Lunar Node Revolution Period.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 83. THE PLUTO SYSTEM AND THE INNER SOLAR SYSTEM.
This image displays – during one rotation period of (binary planet) Pluto/Charon – The SUMS of ANGLES
(A). Rotated by The Five LARGE Inner Solar System Revolving Bodies.
(B). Rotated by (neighbour planets) Earth and Mars.
(C). Rotated by Mars and its two satellites.
(D). Rotated by The Sun and its INNERMOST Satellite (Mercury.
(E). Revolved by The Four Inner Solar System Planets.
(F). Rotated by The Three INNERMOST Satellites of The Inner Solar System (Mercury, The Moon, and Phobos)
(G). Rotated by Earth’s Two Neighbour Planets (Venus and Mars).
(H). Rotated by The Seven Prograde Inner Solar System Bodies.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 84. THE PLUTO SYSTEM AND THE FOUR SLOW-ROTATING INNER SOLAR SYSTEM BODIES.
The Four SLOW-ROTATING Inner Solar System Bodies are:- (A). The Sun, and (B). Mercury, and (C). Venus, and (D). The Moon.
This image displays The SUM of The ANGLES rotated by The Four Satellites of (binary planet) Pluto/Charon during the rotation period of each of these four bodies.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here
EXAMPLE 85.
The PROGRADE (rotation) Naked-Eye Visible Planets are:- (A). Mercury, and (B). Earth, (Venus has RETROGRADE Rotation.) and (C). Mars, and (D). Jupiter, and (E). Saturn.
This image displays The SUM of The ANGLES revolved by Pluto’s Five Satellites (ie:- Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra) during TWO Rotation Periods of each of these planets.
Once again, we see (glaringly, blindingly obvious!) “OCTANT HUGGING”. Once again Newtonian Physics is absolutely impotent as far as providing an explanation.
To see a full demonstration of how these angles are calculated (together with relevant numerical data, and links to scans from the original published numerical data sources), click here